That is possible the most awesome form of toothgnip ever. It's like some sort of demonice jawa yoda.

	65% (17)	Hell yeah!
	15% (4)	What?
	19% (5)	Cylindrical Meat Product.

Awesome indeed.

But the big question is: what happened to Bob?

My guess is that Toothgnip and Neil had a bit of the Donner Party thing going on.

Or course, I've been wrong [goats.com] before.

In Response to mkinyon (#37453):

You're asking the question wrong.

What about Bob?

In Response to zamphir (#37455):

No, the wording was deliberate.

That's how much I dislike Richard Dreyfuss.

In Response to mkinyon (#37453):

My guess is that Toothgnip and Neil had a bit of the Donner sex Party thing going on.

T, FTFY

In Response to AsphaltBuffet (#37457):

I can't find any appropriate way to combine cannibalism and necrophilia.

The words, that is.

In Response to themysticalone (#37480):

necrobalism?

necro - from the greek for "dead"
bal - from the greek for "to bone an alien"
ism - from the egyptian for "evil goat"

In Response to mkinyon (#37456):

You object to that movie because of Richard Dreyfuss?

In Response to zamphir (#37493):

You find it so surprising that you put his name in italics?

In Response to mkinyon (#37498):

He was just quoting you.

In Response to deerboy (#37500):

I always read text within <em> tags in a loud, masculine voice.

Of course, for text within <tt> tags, I do my best Majel Barrett impersonation.

In Response to mkinyon (#37498):

I consider the presence of Richard Dreyfuss in that film to be almost the least objectionable thing there is about the film.

This does not in any way disagree with your assessment of Richard Dreyfuss. It's merely a matter of relative merit. It's like complaining about a flatulogical reference in a well-told version of The Aristocrats. "I didn't like that joke, because it talked about farting".

In Response to mkinyon (#37504):

I always use <i> tags, not <em>

In Response to zamphir (#37506):

Well then its a good thing that this site is declaring itself as HTML 4.0 Transitional instead of XHTML 1.0 Strict.

Either way, it still fails validation and <i> is permitted in XHTML Transitional.

In Response to Dynedain (#37508):

HTML will never go to version 5.

It's a dead language, as dead as dead can be. First it killed the ISOs, now it's killing me.

It will be replaced entirely by GoogleText Markup Language in 2011.

In Response to zamphir (#37505):

I'm sure there are more objectionable elements to the film, but until the Head Alien [walkypedia.com] decides to use it in place of The Sound of Music [imdb.com] as a form of torture [itswalky.com], I can only make educated guesses as to what those elements are (e.g., pre-Rushmore [wikipedia.org] Bill Murray). RD's presence was enough to prevent me from seeing the film at all.

Undercutting my own argument, note that I very much liked his performance in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead [imdb.com].

Consistency, hobgoblins, and all that, don't ya know.

In Response to mkinyon (#37515):

I get Robert Duvall confused with that other guy. Richard Dreyfuss. I think it's the initials, since it's probably not the moustache.

In Response to mkinyon (#37515):

mass linking

Yeah, I just completely ignored that whole post just because there was too much text contrast. You need a TL;DR at the end, much like tele*.

By the way, where's tele* been?

In Response to AsphaltBuffet (#37537):

By the way, where's tele* been?

I've been moderating threads, then trying not to post in them-- but since you asked....

Also i've been doing what i do best; i.e., slippery dildonic stuffing, music appreciation, and taking heaps of drugs. Plus i cooked some lovely dinner tonight: chicken, cous-cous, asparagus, tomato sauce, red bell pepper, carrot, Havarti, Swiss, pesto-Jack, and parmesan, and lots of spices. Then i had a bowl of Reese's peanut-butter-cup ice cream atop double-fudge cookies with dribblings of caramel. Drugs work.

In Response to Teledildonix (#37540):

Food and drugs.

That's what mouths are for.

Mmm, mmm.

In Response to unFalln (#37546):

Why in the world would you leave such a wide opening?

In Response to deerboy (#37555):

Traffic.

We are talking about my mouth, right?

In Response to unFalln (#37570):

Maybe we're talking about your icon.

In Response to Robonun (#37585):

What a coincidence! my icon has been talking about you too ;)

In Response to unFalln (#37586):

(;) (:) (;) (:) (;) (:)

Now Jon has trumped the awesomeness of a demonic Toothgnip with the fabulisciousness of melting Rainbow Brite [goats.com]. " Ohhhhh... What a world! What a world! [imdb.com] Now i want to see how Alfred and his hat [goats.com] figure into all of this-- and i hope we'll have more of this ridiculously colorful artwork when that happens!